Empirical Look at the Factors Affecting Perception of Business Ethics in Turkey

This study aims to explore the influence of gender, age, education, profession and sector choices towards factors affecting business ethics in Turkey. Self-administered questionnaire with scale of 1-5 was used to measure attitudes towards business ethics (1= "strongly agree" to 5="strongly disagree") with reasonable good score on Cronbach's realibility test. With Cronbach alpha of .692 and KMO (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Meaure of Sampling Adequecy) .746 (which sould be greater than .5 for a satisfactor analysis) we proceeded to our analysis successfully. Choice job, sector, age and gender were significant determinants to factors affecting perception of business ethics but education level was not a significant determinant

of Turkey.Though it is a Constitutional obligation, only the Confederation of Turkish Tradesmen and Craftsmen of the 15 PA"s has "public servants ethicl rules".(TYEC Report-II, 2009) Union of Turkish Chambers of Agriculture is the only PA that has no codes of conduct, High Pride/Discipline/Ethics Commission and profesional ethical rules.None of the 15 has all 3 criterias complete.(TYEC Report-II, 2009) There are mainly 3 levels of factors affecting the ethical behavior macro-level, (culture, economics, technology, religion, law), middle-level (competition, job, organizational culture, leader), and micro-level or individual level (demographics, family, values, beliefs).(Tahmasebi, 2010

Literature
In business ethics literature researches are categorized in two main categories mainly conceptual and empirical.(Preble and Reichel, 1988) Our research approach is empirical which places emphasis on examining prevailing business ethics perceptions and attitudes in Turkey.There is a full body of literature in general supporting difference in attitudes on gender perception of business ethics (Dawson, 1997;Gilligan, 1982

Sample
For this study, five hundred selfadministered questionnaires were collected from adults working in and around Istanbul area.Snowball sampling method was used in which questionnaires were distributed to business ethics students at Kadir Has University , to their working friends, relatives and colleagues.Respondents were also interviewed by students.Participation to our survey was voluntary and no remuneration was offered.Prior to performing the necessary statistical analysis, frequency distributions were tabulated for each item to ascertain possible response biass.In addition, a visiual inpection was also performed to identify possible anomalies in which 230 respondents out of 730 were eliminated leaving us with total of 500 respondents.
All respondents were asked to respond each 21 statements.A five-point response scale was employed (1= "strongly agree" to 5="strongly disagree") for all items indicating their belief about that particular situation.Our analyses included descriptive statistics, correlations and regression analysis.Correlations were calculated to gain an initial understanding of the relationship between the variables.

Instruments
The survey instrument consists of 21 statements that describe a specific event that has some kind of ethical choice connotation.Survey is conducted in Turkish for clarity, readability and understandability by the Turkish respondents.In addition, respondents were asked to provide demographic data about themselves.The data collected from the survey was analysed by reliability test, frequency analysis, factor analysis and regression analysis ANOVA test.Two hypothesises will be tested.The hypotheses are listed below: Hypothesis 1: H0: Age and Gender is a positive determinant of attitude towards business ethics.H1: Age and Gender is not a positive determinant of attitude towards business ethics.Hypothesis 2: H0: Job and Sector is a positive determinant of attitude towards business ethics.H1: Job and Sector is not a positive determinant of attitude towards business ethics.In order to test the hypothesizes, factor analysis was used twice.The first factor analysis was done to the 21 questions in order to gain the factors related to the erthical variables.
The second factor analysis was done to gain the important factors for the demographic issues.The variables for each factor analysis were retained for regression analysis.
The article continuous with the two different factor analysis and then the regression analysis is done to test the two hypothesises.

Reliability Test
When reliability analysis was tested with the 21 questiones included in the questtionnaire the cronbach alpha was found to be 0,692 which means that the data collected is consistently reliable to be analysed.

Frequency Analysis
Demographic data were also summarized to provide insights into the nature of the participants.Demographic characteristics of Turkish respondents are as follows.
When reliability analysis was tested with the 21 questiones included in the questtionnaire the cronbach alpha was found to be 0,692 which means that the data collected is consistently reliable to be analysed.

Factor Analysis for Ethical variables (FA#1)
Inspection of scree plot and Eigen values enabled the analysis to reduce the 21 business ethics variables into five factors.Inspection of scree plot and Eigen values enabled the analysis to reduce the 4 variables into two main factors.

Factor 1: Job and Sector Factor
First factor includes both job and sector.

Factor 2: Age and Gender Factor
Second factor has two components age and gender.
These two factors will be used as the dependent variables and factor analysis #1 factors will be taken as the independent variables in the following regression analysis.The ANOVA done for this analysis shows that if the significant value is greater than 0.05 which means that the independent variables (business ethics variables) do not explain the total variation very well according to the dependent variable (age and gender/ job and sectorthe null hypothesis is rejected, meaning that there is no relationship between age, gender and business ethics variables / job and sector and business ethichs variables.

V. Regression Analysis
The ANOVA done for this analysis shows that if the significant value is smaller than 0.05 which means that the independent variables (business ethics variables) does explain the total variation very well according to the dependent variable (age and gender/job and sector).So we accept the null hypothesis, meaning that there is a relationship between age, gender and business ethics/ job and sector and business ethichs variables.
The ANOVA done for this analysis shows that if the significant value is slightly above 0, 05 which means that the independent variables (business ethics variables) does explain the total variation slightly but not bad according to the dependent variable (age and gender/job and sector).So we accept the null hypothesis, meaning that there is a slight relationship between age, gender and business ethics/ job and sector and business ethichs variables.

VI. Conclusion
This study explored the influence of gender, age, job profession and sector choices towards factors affecting business ethics in Turkey.Self-administered questionnaire with scale of 1-5 was used to measure attitudes towards business ethics.The reliability test resulted with a cronbach alpha of 0,692 shows that the data is consistantly reliable to analyse especially for factor analysis and regression analysis.
Regarding the frequency distribution of the data 30.8% of the respondents were at the age of 18 through 25, 25.6% through 26 to 30 and 15.4% through 31 to 35.Cumulative3 percentage of age shows that almost 72% of the respndents were at the age through 18 to 35.49% of the respondents were female and the rest were male.73.8% of the respondents were university graduates and 21% were highscholl graduates.The job distribution of respondents was huge.The job distribution was among 55 different job titles.The repsondents had a sector distribution of 33 which is listed in Table 5 above.
Factor analysis was done twice for different reasons.The first factor analysis (FA#1) was tested for the 21 questions included in the questionnaire related to business ethics variables.The second factor analysis (FA#2) was done to gain the important factors for the demographic issues.
Each variable from factor analysis were retained for the regression analysis.
According to the results of regression analysis job and sector factor has a strong relationship with the encouraging factor specifically with "facing lack of knowledge and miscompetence at workplace"; with managerial factor in addition specifically with "feeling guilty if the worker sees someone making a transaction at the expence of the company and not tell" variable.Job and sector has a slight relationship with the compelling factor but no relationship with its components.It also has slight relationship with one of the components of managerial factor which is "managers have an influence over the business ethics of the company".Age and gender factor has a strong relationship with managerial factor same as it had with job and sector fctor.Age and gender factor has a slight relationship with the compelling factor but no relationship with its components; with family factor and its components such as "effective coomunication being very important" and "having good relationship to show respect to people.
Recent findings in the literature pointed us to the fact that, open to conflict, most previous research in the field were dominated by normative approach.(Hosmer, 2000) There is a lack of empirical research which this paper hopes to fill by generating facts through empirical research to provide solutions to some of the conflicts.Hopefully, our findings could be incorporated into acceptable further normative studies and we would reach our goal.

VII. Discussion
So our current findings with five components under factor one and their relationship to factor two with two components (job,sector, and gender, age & education) which is trying to establish positive correlation among them.In our case they are job, sector and gender and age, education is not.Our result confirms with the Turkish tradition that family is the key factor replacing education in ethics.When we take into consideration the current availability of ethics education over PA"s and their affectiveness in Turkey, our result is not suprising.
Our current findings where job, sector and gender and age are positively correlated with perception of business ethics and no significant correlation found between education.Are coherant with the previous works.Number of directions for the future research might be suggessted forexample more detailed view of dominant professions in terms of perception of business ethics might be in order.

Factor 1 :Factor 2 :
Work Environment FactorFactor one Work Environment Factor has 5 components included such as; Q1.The rights which are provided to me in my workplace are enough and protective Q2.I believe that I am working in an honest workplace Q3.The social responsibility projects in my workplace are sufficient Q4.I believe that my work environment is transparent Q5.At workplace enough importance is given to business ethics Compelling Factor Q15.I find it unethical to use child labor (under 18) in my workplace Q16.I find it unethical for workers at my workplace gossip about each other Q17.I find it unethical for co-workers to blame each other for things they did not do

Factor 3 :
Encouraging Factor Q12.In my workplace everybody works professionally Q13.I am not faced with any lack of knowledge and miscompetence at my workplace Q14.No discrimination or no preferential treatment at my workplace Factor 4: Family Factor Q20.An effective communication is very important at workplace Q21.I believe the golden rule of having a good communication is to respect others Factor 5: Managerial Factor Q18.I will feel guilty if I see someone at work making a transaction at the expense of the company and not tell Q11.Managers have an influence over the business ethics of the company 4.3.2Factor Analysis for Demographic Issues (FA#2)

Table 1 :
Age Distribution

Table 2 :
Gender Distribution

Table 3 :
Education Distribution

Table 4 :
Job Distribution

Table 6 :
Analysis of Hypothesis 1 and Hypothesis 2 are seen in the table below.ANOVA Analysis Results