Mutual Fund Performance: Evidence From South Africa

Authors

  • Ömer Faruk Tan MEF University, Economics Department

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/emaj.2015.83

Keywords:

Mutual Fund, South Africa, Performance Evaluation

Abstract

This paper aims to evaluate the performance of South African equity funds between January 2009 and November 2014. This study period overlaps with the study period of quantitative easing during which developing economies in financial markets have been influenced severely. Thanks to the increase in the money supply directed towards the capital markets, a relief was experienced in related markets following the crisis period. During this 5-year 10-month period, in which the relevant quantitative easing continued, Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE) yielded approximately %16 compounded on average, per year. In this study, South African equity funds are examined in order to compare these funds' performance within this period.Within this scope- 10 South African equity funds are selected. In order to measure these funds' performances, the Sharpe ratio (1966), Treynor ratio (1965), Jensen's alpha (1968) methods are used. Jensen's alpha is also used in identifying selectivity skills of fund managers. Furthermore, the Treynor & Mazuy (1966) and Henriksson & Merton (1981) regression analysis methods are applied to ascertain the market timing ability of fund managers. Furthermore, Treynor & Mazuy (1966) regression analysis method is applied for market timing ability of fund managers.

Author Biography

Ömer Faruk Tan, MEF University, Economics Department

My name is Ömer Faruk TAN. I am a research assistant at MEF University in economics department, Istanbul, Turkey.

References

Chang, E., & Lewellen, W. (1984). Market timing and mutual funds investment performance. Journal of Business, 57, 57-72.

Chen, D., Gan. C., & Hu, B. (2013). An empirical study of mutual funds performance in China. Social Science Research Network. Retrieved January 10, 2015 from SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstrat=2220323.

Christensen, M. (20059. Danish mutual fund performance; Selectivity, market timing and persistence. Working Paper, Department of Accounting, Finance and Logistics, Aarhus School of Business, 1-37.

Dahlquist, M., Engström, S., & Söderlind, P. (2000). Performance and characteristics of Swedish mutual funds. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 35, 409-423.

Deepak, A. (2011). Measuring performance of Indian mutual funds. Social Science Research Network. Retrieved November 15, 2014 from SSRN: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1311761.

Detzler, M. L. (1999). Performance of global bond mutual funds. Journal of Banking & Finance, 23, 1195-1217.

Duggimpudi R. R., Abdou, H. A., & Zaki, M. (2010). An investigation of equity diversified mutual funds: The case of Indian market. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 7(4), 77-84.

Gallo, J, G., & Swanson, P. E. (1996). Comparative measures of performance for U.S. – based international equity mutual funds. Journal of Banking & Finance, 20, 1636-1650.

Gilbertson, B. P., & Vermaak, M. N. (1982). The performance of South African mutual funds: 1974-1981. Investment Analysts Journal, 11(20), 35-45.

Henriksson, R. D. (1984). Market timing and mutual fund performance: An empirical investigation. The Journal of Business, 57(1), 73-96.

Henriksson, R. D., & Merton, R. C. (1981). On market timing and investment performance. II. Statistical procedures for evaluating forecasting skills. The Journal of Business, 54(4), 513-533.

Investment company institute (ICI) -Unit investments trust data. Retrieved from February, 15, 2015 from http://www.ici.org/research/stats.

Jensen, M.C. (1968). The performance of mutual funds in the period 1945-1964. The Journal of Finance, 23(2), 389-416.

Kouris, A., Beneki, C., Adam, M., & Botsaris, C. (2011). An assessment of the performance of Greek mutual equity funds selectivity and market timing. Applied Mathematics Sciences, 5(4), 159-171.

Malkiel, B, G. (1995). Returns from investing in equity funds: 1971-1991. Journal of Finance, 50, 549-572.

Manjezi, L. (2012). Portfolio performance evaluation of South African mutual funds 2001-2006. Unpublished master’s thesis. University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway.

Mayo, H. B. (2011). Introduction to investments (10th. Edition). Southwestern Cengage Learning, Mason, USA.

Mbiola, O. J. (2013). Performance evaluation of unit trusts in South Africa over the last two decades. Unpublished master’s thesis. University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.

Noulas, G., Papanastation, J. A., & Lazaridis, J. (2005). Performance of mutual funds. Managerial Finance, 31(2), 101-112.

Rao, D. N. (2006). Investment styles and performance of equity mutual funds in India. Social Sciences Research Network. Retrieved November 15, 2014 from SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=922595 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.922595.

Reilly, F, R. (1992). Investments (3rd. edition). Orlando, Florida: The Dryden Press.

Sharpe, W. F. (1996). Mutual fund performance. Journal of Business, 34, 119-138.

Treynor, J. L. (1965). How to rate management of investment funds. Harvard Business Review. 43(1), 131-136.

Treynor, J. L., & Mazuy, K.K. (1966). Can mutual funds outguess the market? Harvard Business Review, 44, 131-136.

Tripathy, N. P. (2005). An empirical evaluation of market timing abilities of Indian fund managers on equity linked savings scheme. Delhi Business Review, 6(2), 19-27.

What is quantitative easing? Definition and explanation. Retrieved January 23, 2015 from http://useconomy.about.com/od/glossary/g/Quantitative-Eaing.htm.

Downloads

Published

2015-11-12

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 2 (2015)

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.