Factors Affecting the Adoption of Mobile Payment Systems: An Empirical Analysis

İkram Daştan, Cem Gürler

Abstract


The world witnessed a rapid growth in the e-commerce in the recent years. Widespread use of mobile devices in the e-commerce has a role in this augmentation. Associated with growth of trading volume and the introduction of new devices, new products and solutions emerge and they diversify concerning online payments. Consumer attitudes and behaviors may change according to these developments. The purpose of this study is to investigate the factors effecting adoption of mobile payment systems by the consumer. 225 individuals were surveyed online through convenience sampling method. A research model was developed and proposed relationships were tested using structural equation modeling. The empirical findings point out that perceived trust, perceived mobility and attitudes positively affect the adoption of MPS; perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use have no effect on adoption of MPS. Furthermore perceived reputation positively related to perceived trust and finally environmental risk negatively related to perceived trust.


Keywords


Mobile payment systems, M-Payment, Mobile payment adoption, Mobile Technologies, Adoption of MPS

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adams, D. A., Nelson, R. R., & Todd, P. A. (1992). Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: a replication. MIS quarterly, 227-247.

Amoako-Gyampah, K., & Salam, A. F. (2004). An extension of the technology acceptance model in an ERP implementation environment. Information & Management, 41(6), 731-745.

Barnes, S.,J. (2002). Wireless digital advertising: Nature and implications. International Journal of Advertising, 21, 399–420.

Berthon, P., Ewing, M., & Hah, L. L. (2005). Captivating company: Dimensions of attractiveness in employer branding. International journal of advertising, 24(2), 151-172.

Blöchlinger, M. (2012). Mobile Payment Systems. Internet Economics VI, 41.

Bozkurt, M. (2011). İşletmelerin İtibar Yönetimi Faaliyetlerinin Müşteri Tutum ve Tercihleri Üzerindeki Yansımaları. Uşak Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi,2011(7).

Chau, P. Y., & Hu, P. J. H. (2002). Investigating healthcare professionals’ decisions to accept telemedicine technology: an empirical test of competing theories. Information & management, 39(4), 297-311.

Childers, T. L., Carr, C. L., Peck, J., & Carson, S. (2002). Hedonic and utilitarian motivations for online retail shopping behavior. Journal of retailing,77(4), 511-535.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 319-340.

Demircan, N., & Ceylan, A. (2003). Örgütsel güven kavramı: Nedenleri ve sonuçları. Yönetim ve Ekonomi: Celal Bayar Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 10(2), 139150.

Devaraj, S., Fan, M., & Kohli, R. (2002). Antecedents of B2C channel satisfaction and preference: validating e-commerce metrics. Information systems research, 13(3), 316-333.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 39-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3151312

Gefen, D., & Straub, D. W. (2000). The relative importance of perceived ease of use in IS adoption: a study of ecommerce adoption. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 1(1), 8.

Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping: an integrated model. MIS quarterly, 27(1), 51-90.

Hair J.F., Anderson R.E., Tahtam R.L. and Balck V.C.. (1995), Multivarite Data Analysis with Reading” Prentice Hall, International Inc, A Viacorn Company, New Jersey.

Huang, E. (2005). The acceptance of womencentric websites. The Journal of Computer Information Systems, 45(4), 75.

IAB (2010), $6.4 Billion in Q3 2010 Sets New Record for Internet Advertising Revenues, retrieved from http://www.iab.net/about_the_iab/recen t_press_releases/press_release_archive/press_release/pr-111710 (Access Date: 03.03.2014)

Ipsos ING (2015) http://www.ing.com/web/file?uuid=fde 0bb20-c23c-4a70-9b587ed3d6ec95e2&owner=b03bc017e0db-4b5d-abbf003b12934429&contentid=33730 (Access date: 10.11.2015)

Jin, B., Yong Park, J., & Kim, J. (2008). Crosscultural examination of the relationships among firm reputation, esatisfaction, e-trust, and eloyalty.International Marketing Review, 25(3), 324-337.

Kalkan, A. (2011). Kişisel Tutum, Öznel Norm Ve Algılanan Davranış Kontrolünün Girişimcilik Niyeti Üzerindeki Etkisi: Üniversite Öğrencileri Üzerine Bir Uygulama. Journal Of Süleyman Demirel University Institute Of Social Sciences Year, 2(14).

Kannan, P. K., Chang, A. M., & Whinston, A. B. (2001). Wireless commerce: marketing issues and possibilities. In System Sciences. Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE.

Karatepe, S. (2008). İtibar yönetimi: Halkla ilişkilerde güven yaratma.Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 23(23).

Karnouskos, S. (2004). Mobile payment: a journey through existing procedures and standardization initiatives. Communications Surveys & Tutorials, IEEE,6(4), 44-66.

Karnouskos, S., Hondroudaki, A., Vilmos, A., & Csik, B. (2004). Security, trust and privacy in the secure mobile payment service. In 3rd International Conference on Mobile Business, 35.

Kim, B. G., Park, S. C., & Lee, K. J. (2008). A structural equation modeling of the Internet acceptance in Korea. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 6(4), 425-432.

Kim, C., Mirusmonov, M., & Lee, I. (2010). An empirical examination of factors influencing the intention to use mobile payment. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(3), 310-322.

Kim, C., Tao, W., Shin, N., & Kim, K. S. (2010). An empirical study of customers’ perceptions of security and trust in e-payment systems. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 9(1), 84-95.

Küçük, E. (2012). Planlanmış Davranış Teorisi Çerçevesinde Mali Müşavir (SMMM) Olma Niyetinin Altında Yatan Faktörlerin Analizi. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 7(14), 145-162.

Lu, J., Yu, C. S., Liu, C., & Yao, J. E. (2003). Technology acceptance model for wireless Internet. Internet Research, 13(3), 206-222.

Mallat, N. (2007). Exploring consumer adoption of mobile payments–A qualitative study. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 16(4), 413-432.

Mallat, N. (2007). Exploring consumer adoption of mobile payments–A qualitative study. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 16(4), 413-432..

Mui, L., Mohtashemi, M., & Halberstadt, A. (2002, January). A computational model of trust and reputation. In System Sciences, 2002. HICSS. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on (pp. 24312439). IEEE.

Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system.Consulted, 1(2012), 28.

Özer, G., Özcan, M., & Aktaş, S. (2010). Muhasebecilerin bilgi teknolojisi kullaniminin teknoloji kabul modeli (TKM) ile incelenmesi. Journal of Yasar University, 3278, 3293.

Pavlou, P. A. (2003). Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. International journal of electronic commerce, 7(3), 101-134.

Ron, D., & Shamir, A. (2013). Quantitative analysis of the full bitcoin transaction graph. In Financial Cryptography and Data Security (pp. 6-24). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Schierz, P. G., Schilke, O., & Wirtz, B. W. (2010). Understanding consumer acceptance of mobile payment services: An empirical analysis. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 9(3), 209-216.

Srivastava, S. C., Chandra, S., & Theng, Y. L. (2010). Evaluating the role of trust in consumer adoption of mobile payment systems: An empirical analysis.Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 27, 561-588.

Szymanski, D. M., & Hise, R. T. (2000). Esatisfaction: an initial examination.Journal of retailing, 76(3), 309-322.

Tzou, R. C., & Lu, H. P. (2009). Exploring the emotional, aesthetic, and ergonomic facets of innovative product on fashion technology acceptance model. Behaviour & Information Technology, 28(4), 311-322.

Ustasüleyman, T., & Eyüboğlu, K. (2010). Bireylerin İnternet Bankacılığını Benimsemesini Etkileyen Faktörlerin Yapısal Eşitlik Modeli ile Belirlenmesi.BDDK Bankacılık ve Finansal Piyasalar, 4(2), 11-38.

Van der Heijden, H. (2002). Factors affecting the successful introduction of mobile payment systems. BLED 2002 Proceedings, 20.

Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information systems research, 11(4), 342-365.

Yang, H. D., & Yoo, Y. (2004). It's all about attitude: revisiting the technology acceptance model. Decision Support Systems, 38(1), 19-31.

Yang, S., Lu, Y., Gupta, S., Cao, Y., & Zhang, R. (2012). Mobile payment services adoption across time: An empirical study of the effects of behavioral beliefs, social influences, and personal traits. Computers in Human Behavior,28(1), 129-142.

Yap, B. W., & Khong, K. W. (2006). Examining the effects of customer service management (CSM) on perceived business performance via structural equation modelling. Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, 22(5‐6), 587-605.

Yılmaz, V., Çatalbaş, G. K., & Çelik, H. E. (2009). Kredi Kartı Kullanma Niyetini Etkileyen Faktörlerin Yapısal Eşitlik Modeliyle Araştırılması.Bankacılar Dergisi, 68, 20-29.

Zhou, T. (2013). An empirical examination of continuance intention of mobile payment services. Decision Support Systems, 54(2), 1085-1091.

Zmijewska, A., Lawrence, E., & Steele, R. (2004, October). Towards Understanding of Factors Influencing User Acceptance of Mobile Payment Systems. In ICWI, 270-277.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/emaj.2016.95

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2016 EMAJ: Emerging Markets Journal