Different Approaches in Recruiting Young Professionals
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5195/emaj.2018.149Keywords:
Young Professionals, Generation Y, CEMS MIM, Life Values, RecruitmentAbstract
Young Professionals as a significant part of Generation Y have already been examined in various studies that focused on their views, attitudes, values etc. This paper examines the differences in the importance of work and life values among peers of the same age with similar background, but from different study groups. To test the propositions, a life value inventory was distributed among 262 students and alumni from two different study programs at the same Faculty between December 2016 and May 2017. The data were analyzed in the SPSS statistical software with the use of the k-means clustering. The hypotheses expecting differences in life and work values were partially confirmed. The findings are discussed within the framework of strategic leadership and the need of engaging stakeholders.
References
Brown, D. (1996). Brown’s Values-Based, Holistic Model of Career and Life-Role Choices and Satisfaction. In Career Choice and Development (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Brown, D. (2002). The Role of Work Values and Cultural Values in Occupational Choice, Satisfaction, and Success: A Theoretical Statement. In Career Choice and Development (4th ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Brown, D. and Crace, R. K. (1996). Values in Life Role Choices and Outcomes: A Conceptual Model. The Career Development Quarterly, 44(3), 211-223.
Brown, D. and Crace, K. R. (1996/2002). Life Values Inventory: Facilitator’s Guide [PDF].
CEMS. (2018). Key Facts & Figures, Cems.org, CEMS - The Global Alliance In Management Education, www.cems.org/about-cems/overview/key-facts-figures.
Chládová, M., Lorenc, M. (2011). Development and Effective Leading of Student Team Work. International Journal of Case Method Research & Application. 23(3), 216–227.
Festing, M. and Schäfer, L. (2014). Generational challenges to talent management: A framework for talent retention based on the psychological-contract perspective. Journal of World Business, 49(2), 262-271.
Flodrová, T., & Šilerová, L. (2011). Generace Y – jiná cílová skupina. Strategie, 19 (10), 58-59.
Hauw, S. D., & Vos, A. D. (2010). Millennials’ Career Perspective and Psychological Contract Expectations: Does the Recession Lead to Lowered Expectations? Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(2), 293-302.
Hershatter, A., & Epstein, M. (2010). Millennials and the World of Work: An Organization and Management Perspective. Journal of Business & Psychology. 25 (2), 211–223.
Howe, N., & Strauss, B. (1993). 13th Gen: Abort, retry, ignore, fail? New York: Vintage Books.
Kirovová, I. (2011). Od tradiční kariéry k současným kariérním koncepcím. Československá psychologie. 55 (4), 316-331.
Kolář, O. (2015). Analýza kariérního vývoje absolventů Vysoké školy ekonomické v Praze (Master's thesis, University of Economics, Prague, 2015). Prague: University of Economics.
Mayrhofer, W., Nordhaug, O., & Obeso, C. (2009). Portrait of a New Generation of Leaders: Project Summary Report CEMS L’Oréal Fellowship (Rep.). Paris, France: CEMS Head Office.
Patton, W., & McMahon, M. (2006). Career development and systems theory: Connecting theory and practice. Rotterdam: Sense. Managing tomorrow’s people: Millennials at work – perspectives from a new generation. [PDF]. (2008).
PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited. Millennials at work – Reshaping the workplace. [PDF]. (2011). PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited.
Schullery, N. (2013). Workplace Engagement and Generational Differences in Values. Business Communication Quarterly. 76 (2), 252–265.
Shoemaker, P., Krupp, P. J. H., Howland, S. (2013). Strategic Leadership: The Essential Skills. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved online: https://hbr.org/2013/01/strategic-leadership-the-esssential-skills
Twenge, J. M., et al. (2010a). Generational Differences in Work Values: Leisure and Extrinsic Values Increasing, Social and Intrinsic Values Decreasing. Journal of Management. 36 (5), 1117-1142.
Twenge, J. M. (2010b). A Review of the Empirical Evidence on Generational Differences in Work Attitudes. Journal of Business & Psychology. 25 (2), 201-210.
Ware, L. B. (2014). Stop the Gen Y revolving door. T+D. 68 (5), 58-63.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
- Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
- The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
- Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
- The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
- Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
- The Author represents and warrants that:
- the Work is the Author’s original work;
- the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- the Work has not previously been published;
- the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
- The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.