DOES EU-INTEGRATION CHANGE AGGLOMERATION PROCESS? THE IMPACT OF EU MEMBERSHIP PROCESS ON THE CITY-SIZE DISTRIBUTION OF TURKEY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5195/emaj.2013.35Abstract
This paper aims to reveal the eventual impacts of European Union (EU) membership process and other conventional factors on the city-size distribution of a candidate country (Turkey). I can state main results as follows: Analyzing from different estimation methods the direct effect of the EU reforms on agglomerating forces rather than congesting forces are revealed to be dominant for Turkey. However, the main impact of the EU membership process has positive but modest coefficient that indicate the weak willingness of the country for EU reforms.
Keywords: Economic itegration, agglomeration, city-size distribution, EU, Turkey.
JEL Classification: F15, F22, R12, R23
References
Abdel-Rahman, H. and Wang, P. (1995), Toward a general-equilibrium theory of a core-periphery system of cities, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 25, pp. 529-546.
Auerbach, F. (1913): Das Gesets der Bevolkerungsknzentration. Petermann's Mitteilungen, 59:74-76.
Baldwin, R.E. (2001), Core-periphery model with forward-looking expectations, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 31, pp. 21-49.
Black, D. and Henderson, V. (1998), Spatial Evolution of Population and Industry in the United States, The American Economic Review, Vol. 89, No. 2, Papers and Proceedings of the One Hundred Eleventh Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association (May, 1999), pp. 321-327.
Black, D. and Henderson, V. (1999), A theory of Urban Growth, Journal of Political Economy, 107(2), pp. 252-84.
Black, D. and Henderson, V. (2003), Urban evolution in the USA, Journal of Economic Geography, 3, 343372.
Brakman, S, Garretsen, H., and van Marrewijk, C. (2001), An Introduction to Geographical Economics, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press (Third edition, 2005).
Christaller, W. (1933), Die Zentralen Orte in Suddeutschland, Iéna ; English translation C.W. BASKIN, 1966, Central places in Southern Germany, Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall.
Embrechts, P., Kluppelberg, C, Mikosch, T. (1997), Modelling External Events for Insurance and Finance, Springer, New York.
Eurostat (2008), Eurostat data set, www.eurostat.eu, [acceded 10/12/2007]
Gabaix, X., Ioannides, Y. (2004), The evolution of city size distributions, Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, in: J. V. Henderson & J. F. Thisse (ed.), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, edition 1, volume 4, chapter 53, pages 2341-2378.
Getz, M. (1979), Optimum city size: fact or fancy? Law and Contemporary Problems, Vol. 43, No. 2, Growth Policy in the Eighties (Spring, 1979), pp. 197-210.
Henderson, V., Kuncoro, A., and Turner, M. (1995), Industrial Development in Cities, Journal of Political Economy, 103(5), pp. 1067-1090.
Hill, B.M. (1975), A simple approach to inference about the tail of a distribution, Annals of Statistics 3, pp 1163-1174.
Hill, B.M. (1996a), The Self-Organizing Economy, Blackwell.
Hill, B.M. (1996b), Confronting the mystery of urban hierarchy, Journal of the Japanese and International Economics, 10:399-418.
Krugman, P. (1991), Geography and trade, MIT Press.
Krugman, P. (1996), The Self-Organizing Economy, Blackwell.
Krugman, P. and Livas-Elinzondo R. (1996), Trade Policy and the Third World Metropolis, Journal of Development Economics, 49(1), pp. 137-50.
Lösch A. (1940), Die räumliche Ordnung der Wirtschaft, Iéna, G. FISCHER, English translation (1954), The economics of location, New Haven, Yale University Press.
Mansury, Y. and Gulyas, L. (2006), The emergence of Zipf’s law in a system of cities: an agen-based simulation approach, Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control, in the course of publishing.
Martin, P. and Ottaviano, G.I.P. (2001), Growth and Agglomeration, International Economic Review, 42, 947–968.
Page, S. (1999), On the emergence of cities, Journal of Urban Economics, 45, 184-208.
Parr, J.B. (1985), A note on the size distribution of cities over time, Journal of Urban Economics, 18(2), pp. 199-212.
Pareto, V. (1897), Cours d’économie politique, Lausanne, Switzerland:Rouge.
Pumain D. and Moriconi-Ebrard F. (1997), City size distributions and metropolisation, Geojournal, n°43-4, pp.307-314.
Rosen, K. T., Resnick, M., (1980), The size distribution of cities: An examination of the Pareto law and primacy. Journal of Urban Economics 8 (2), 165-186.
Rosenstein-Rodan, P. (1943), Problems of industrialization in eastern and south-eastern Europe, Economic Journal, 53, 2002-211.
Soo, K.T. (2005), Zipf’s law for cities: a cross-country investigation, Regional Sciences and Urban Economics, 35, 239-263.
Turkish Statistical Institute (2011), The census 2011.
Waltz, U. (1996), Transport costs, Intermediate Goods, and Localized Growth, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 26, 671–695.
Zipf, G.K. (1949), Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort, Addison-Wesley Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
- Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
- The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
- Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
- The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
- Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
- The Author represents and warrants that:
- the Work is the Author’s original work;
- the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- the Work has not previously been published;
- the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
- The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.