Joint-Stock Corporation under Turkish Commercial Law and the Doctrine of Increasing Shareholder Commitments

Authors

  • Berna Tepe Beykent University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/emaj.2015.85

Keywords:

Turkish Commercial Code, joint-stock corporations, principle of single obligation, shareholder commitments, increase in shareholders commitments, reduction of shareholder rights, mergers, rescission of general assembly decisions

Abstract


 ABSTRACT

 

The principle that the shareholder of a joint-stock company is under the single obligation of paying in his contribution to the equity-capital is in force within the framework of the 2011 Turkish Commercial Code. It appears as if the reinforced principle of “single obligation” critically challenges the relevance of the formerly settled norm of subjecting increase in shareholders’ commitments to unanimous consent of all shareholders.  That being said, since the Turkish Commercial Code also contains deviations to the single obligation principle in addition to the fact that the notion of increase is shareholders’ commitments was not made entirely obsolete from the Turkish Commercial Code, the doctrine for subjecting increases in shareholders’ commitments to the general assembly’s unanimous vote is - to an extent - still relevant within the context of the 2011 Turkish Commercial Code.

Author Biography

Berna Tepe, Beykent University

Faculty of Law, Commercial Law Department

References

Bahtiyar, Mehmet “Anonim Ortaklıkta Payların Üçüncü Kişilere Satılması Durumunda Diğer Ortaklara Önalım Hakkı Tanıyan Anasözleşme Hükümleri ve Etkileri”, Banka ve Ticaret Hukuku Araştırma Enstitüsü, BATİDER, vol. XXI, no. 2, 2001, pp. 83-127.

Cahn, A. and Donald, D. “Comparative Company Law”, Cambridge University Press, 2010.

Domaniç, Hayri “Anonim Şirketler Hukuku ve Uygulaması” , Temel Yayınları, 1988.

Eren, Fikret “Borçlar Hukuku – Genel Hükümler”, Beta Basım A.Ş., 2008.

European Parliament, “Rights and obligations of shareholders: National regimes and proposed instruments at EU level for improving legal efficiency” May 2012, accessible via http://www.europarl.europa.eu

Hamamcıoğlu, Esra “Anonim Şirketlerde Anasözleşme Değişikliği”, PhD thesis defended at Marmara University, 2011, accessible via www.yok.gov.tr

Hamel, Lagarde and Jauffret, “Traité de droit commercial”, Dalloz, 1980.

Karasu, Rauf “6102 sayılı Türk Ticaret Kanunu’na göre Anonim Şirketlerde Emredici Hükümler İlkesi”, 6102 sayılı Yeni Türk Ticaret Kanunu’nu Beklerken” University of Marmara, Faculty of Law, Hukuk Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2012, Special Issue of the proceedings held between 10-12 May 2012, vol. 18, no.2, pp. 311- 332.

Köse, Levent “Türk Anonim Ortaklıklar Hukukunda Sözü Edilen Tek Borç İlkesi ile Doktrin ve Tasarının İlkeye Bakışı”, İstanbul Barosu Dergisi, 2010/2, pp. 882 – 885.

Monsèrié-Bon, Marie-Hélène, “Encore l'augmentation des engagements des associés”, Revue Trimestrielle de Droit Commercial, Dalloz, 2004 p. 551.

Nomer, Haluk “Borçlar Hukuku – Genel Hükümler”, Beta Basım A.Ş., 2013.

Petit and Reinhard “Augmentation des engagements des actionnaires”, Revue Trimestrielle de Droit Commercial, 1996, p. 487.

Poroy, R, Tekinalp, T, and Çamoğlu, E. “Ortaklıklar ve Kooperatif Hukuku”, Vedat Kitapçılık, 2014.

Rizzo, Fabrice “Le principe d'intangibilité des engagements des associés”, Revue Trimestrielle de Droit Commercial, Dalloz, 2000, p. 27.

Downloads

Published

2015-11-12

Issue

Section

Articles