Okun’s Law and Long Term Co-Integration Analysis for OECD Countries (1987-2012)

Authors

  • Bilal Kargı Aksaray University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/emaj.2016.97

Keywords:

Economic Growth, OECD Countries, Unemployment.

Abstract

Even though, there are so many so long discussions on the relation between population increase and economic growth, today, general opinion tends to believe that there is a direct relation between population increase and economic growth. This opinion is supported by some empirical studies. Despite an economical growth caused by directly with population growth, it is known that there is a reverse relation between unemployment and growth known as Okun’s Law. This relation, suggesting that every 1 point decrease in unemployment induces a 3 point increase in growth, is tested for many countries. In this study, this hypothesis of Okun is examined and it is found to be true for selected 23 countries, even with the difference in coefficients. At the same time, long term relation between growth and unemployment is tested with the use of time series analysis and long term relation is found for 14 countries. Additionally, tests done for all 34 OECD countries showed that reversed relation between unemployment and growth is valid and they are co-integrated in long run. In this study, countries are categorized according to growth rate as “low”, “normal” and “high” and a consistent unemployment rate for countries with high growth rate could not be seen. In the case of countries with lowest growth rate, generalization that they have quite high unemployment rate can be made.

References

Adjemian, S., Langor, F. & Rojas, C. Q. (2010). How do labor market institutions affect the link between growth and unemployment: The case of the European countries. The Eeuropean Journal of Comparative Economics, 7(2), 347-371.

Amassoma, D. & Nwosa, P. I. (2013). The impact of unemployment rate on productivity growth in Nigeria: A error correction modeling approach. International Journal of Economics and Management Sciences, 2(8), 1-13.

Andrei, D. B., Vasile, D. & Adrian, E. (2009). The correlation between unemployment and real GDP growth. A study case on Romania. Annals of Faculty of Economics, 2(1), 317-322.

Bakas, D. & Papapetrou, E. (2012).Unemployment in Greece: Evidence from Greek regions. Bank of Greece, Working Paper, No.146.

Ball, L., Leigh, D. & Loungani, P. (2013). Okun’s Law: Fit at 50?. NBER Working Paper, No.18668.

Bankole, A. S. & Fatai, B. O. (2013). Empirical test of Okun’s Law in Nigeria. International Journal of Economic Practices and Theories, 3(3), 227-231.

Beaton, K. (2010). Time variation in Okun’s Law: A Canada and U.S. comparison. Bank of Canada Working Paper, No.7.

Boulton, T. (2010). Test of Okun’s Law fort the 10 Eastern Europen countries. London Metropolitan Business School, Economics Subject Group.

Busetta, G. & Corso, D. (2012) Labor productivity and Okun’s Law: An emprical application on Italian regional panel data. Rivista Italiana Degli Economesti, 2, 279-298.

Caraiani, P. (2010). Bayesian linear estimation of Okun coefficient for Romania: Sensitivity to priors distributions. The Romanian Economic Journal, 38, 53-65.

Cazes, S., Verick, S. & Hussami, F. A. (2011). Diverging trends in unemployment in the United States and Europe: Evidence from Okun’s Law and the global financial crisis. International Labor Office, Employment Working Paper, No.106.

Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the estimators of autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 427-431.

Elshamy, H. (2013). The relationship between unemployment and output in Egypt. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 81, 22-26.

Engle, R. F., & Granger, C. W. J. (1987). “Cointegration and error correction: Representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica, 55(2), 251-276.

Giha, C. R., Leat, P. M. & Renwick, A. W. (2012). The relationship between output and employment in Scotland: A regional analysis. Scotland’s Rural College, Working Papers, No.131465.

Gordon, R. J. (2010a). Revisiting and rethinking the business cycle: Okun’s Law and productivity innovations. American Economic Review, 100, 11-15.

Gordon, R. J. (2010b). The demise of Okun’s Law and of procyclical fluctuations in conventional and unconventional measures of productivity. For Presentation at NBER Summer Institute, PRBB Research Meeting, Cambridge.

Gordon, R. J. (2011). The evolution of Okun’s Law and of cyclical productivity fluctuations in the United States and in the EU-15. For Presentation at EES/IAB Workshop, Nuremberg.

Habees, M. A. & Rumman, M. A. (2012). The relationship between unemployment and economic growth in Jordan and some Arab countries. World Applied Sciences Journal. 18(5), 673-680.

Herwartz, H. & Niebuhr, A. (2011). Growth, unemployment and labor market institutions: Evidence from a crosssection of EU regions, Applied Economics, 43(30), 4663-4676.

Hopkin, J. & Blyth, M. (2012). What can Okun teach Polanyi? Efficiency, regulation and equality in the OECD. Review of International Political Economy, 19(1), 1-33.

Huang, H. C. & Lin, S. C. (2008). Smoothtime-varying Okun’s coefficients. Economic Modelling, 25, 363-375.

Huang, H. C. & Yeh, C. C. (2013). Okun’s Law in panels of countries and state. Applied Economics, 45(2), 191-199.

Hutengs, O. & Stadtmann, G. (2012). Age effects in the Okun’s Law within the Eurozone. German Institute for Economic Research, Discussion Papers, No.1243.

Hutengs, O. & Stadtmann, G. (2013). Don’t trust anybody over 30: Youth unemployment and Okun’s Law in CEE countries. European University Viadrina Frankfurt, Department of Business Administration and Economics, Discussion Paper, No.333.

Ibragimov, M., Karimov, J. & Permyakova, E. (2013). Unemployment and output Dynamics in CIS countries: Okun’s law revisited. EERC, Working Paper Series, No.13/04.

Kangasharju, A., Tavera, C. & Nijkamp, P. (2012). Regional growth and unemployment: The validity of Okun’s Law for the finnish regions, Spatial Economic Analysis, 7(3), 381-395.

Kitov, I. O. (2011). Okun’s Law revisited. Is there structural unemployment in developed countries?. MPRA Paper, No.32135.

Kitov, I. & Kitov, O., (2012). Modeling unemployment and employment in advanced economies: Okun’s Law with a structural break. Theoretical and Practical Research in Economic Fields, 5(3), 26-41.

Knotek, E. S. (2007). “How useful is Okun’s Law?. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas, Journal Economic Review, 4, 73-103.

Lal, I., Muhammad, S. D., Jalil, M. A. & Hussain, A. (2010). Test of Okun’s Law in some Asian countries cointegration approach. European Journal of Scientific Research, 40(1), 73-80.

Lang, D. & De Peretti, C. (2009). A strong hysteretic model for Okun’s Law: Theory and preliminary investigation. International Review of Applied Economics, 23(4), 445-462.

Lee, J. (2000). The robustness of Okun’s Law: Evidence from OECD countries. Journal of Macroeconomics, 22(2), 331-356.

Levine, L., (2013). Economic growth and the unemployment rate. CRS Report for Congress.

Mankiw, (2010). Macroeconomics. Seventh Edition, Worth Publishers, New York.

Mitchell, K. & Pearce, D. K. (2009). Do Wall Street economicsts believe in Okun’s Law and the Taylor rule? Journal of Economics and Finance, 34(2), 196-217.

Moazzami, B. & Dadgostar, B. (2009). Okun’s Law revisited: Evidence from OECD Countries. International Business and Economics Research Journal. 8(8), 21-24.

Mosikari, T. J. (2013). The effect of unemployment rate on gross domestic product: Case of South Africa. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 4(6), 429-434.

Oberst, C. A. & Oelgemöller, J. (2013). Economic growth and regional labor market development in German regions: Okun’s Law in a spatial context. FNC Working Paper, No:5.

Okun, A. M. (1962). Potential GNP: Its measurement and significance. Proceedings of the Business and Economics Statistics Section of the American Statistical Association. 98104.

Pierdzioch, C., Rülke, J. C. & Stadtmann, G. (2011). Do Professional economists’ forecasts reflect Okun’s Law? Some evidence fort the G7 countries, Applied Economics, 43(11), 1365-1373.

Plosser, C. I. & Schwert, G. W. (1979). “Potential GNP: Its Measurement and Significance: A Dissenting Opinion”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 10, 179-186.

Sögner, L. & Stiassny, A. (2000). A crossCountry study on Okun’s Law. Vienna University of Economics and Business Administration, Working Paper Series, No:13.

Teck, H. H. (2012). An economic analysis of optimum population size achieved through boosting total fertility and net immigration. National University of Singapore, Institute of Policy Studies.

Tillmann, P. (2010). Do FOMC members believe in Okun’s Law?. Economics Bulletin, 30(3), 2398-2404.

Tingi, N. Y. & Lingii, L. S. (2011). Okun’s Law in Malaysia: An autoregressive distributed LAG (ARDL) approach with Hodrick-Prescott (HP) fitler. Journal of Global Business and Economics, 2(1), 95-103.

Villaverde, J. & Maza, A. (2008). The robustness of Okun’s Law in Spain: 1980-2001 Regional evidence. Journal of Policy Modeling, 31, 289-297.

Zanin, L. & Marra, G. (2012). Rolling regression versus time-varying coefficient modelling: An empirical investigation of the Okun’s Law in some Euro Area countries. Bulletin of Economic Research, 64(1), 91-108.

Downloads

Published

2016-02-02

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 1 (2016)

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.